Analysis Of The Unseen Truth In A Dollhouse By Henrik Ibsen

Ruchit Patel Professor Bonds English 112-11 20 July 2017 The Unseen Truth in A Dollhouse A Dollhouse by Henrik Ibsen is a play that focuses on the women empowerment, basically in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. In today’s era, both women and men rub shoulders together in every field. But when Heneik Ibsen wrote this play in 1879, women were considered powerless. Not every woman in the society had ability to decide the outcome. Divorce was not the option, women were obliged to live the way society demanded. As years go by, society views also changed and women are not only considered â€Å"housewife† but considered a symbol of strength. Nora is the protagonist of the play, is overwhelming controlled and emotionally tortured by†¦show more content†¦20-23). Torvald’s refusal to borrow money shows the character of a strong independent man. But, after reading the first letter written by Krogstad, Torvald calls Nora a â€Å"foolish woman† (3. 305). He blames Nora’s father for Nora’s ‘’want of prin ciple’’ (3. 235-236) and blames her of having no religion and no morality. He even calls Nora a ‘’miserable creature’’ (3. 232). By saying so, Torvald makes a very bad impression on their relationship. As a husband Torvald’s responsibility was to appreciate and help Nora. But the harsh behavior of her husband provoked Nora to leave her house. Nora’s departure will undoubtedly be a costly decision. Whether, the children will be better off is questionable. Although the Helmer’s children are raised by a nurse and their own parents are virtually strangers to them, completely severing paternal bonds can have unforeseen consequences. As Dr. Rank’s father anticipated that his promiscuity would have lifelong and fatal effects on his son. Similarly, Nora cannot predict how her absence will influence her children. However, it is a matter of self-preservation for Nora: she cannot continue to deny her own growth while encouraging growth from her children. Nora realizes that she is indeed not fit to be either a true mother or a wife due to her innocence and lack of self-education. Nora’s ultimate decision to leave the house is justifiable. Nora feels that she is utterly trapped in

Billy Joel Free Essays

Billy Joel is a well known musician who has sold millions of albums across the world. Billy Joel has also won multiple grammys and several other awards. He has worked with many other artists and is affectionately known as â€Å"The Piano Man. We will write a custom essay sample on Billy Joel or any similar topic only for you Order Now † Billy Joel was born on May 9, 1949. He was born as William Martin Joel in Bronx, New York. He grew up in Levittown, New York. He had two siblings a sister named Judith, and his half-brother Alexander Joel. He started his career at a very early stage in his life. At the age of four he began taking piano lessons. He took lessons on piano until he was sixteen. He was in three bands before he could even drive and he was a veteran of all of them. Billy Joel decided to start his music career after watching a famous band called â€Å"The Beatles† on The Ed Sullivan Show. In 1971 he came out with his first album after dropping out of high school to pursue his career in music. The solo album was called â€Å"Cold Spring Harbor.† Billy Joel then decided to move to Los Angeles. Soon after he job a job as a lounge pianist. Billy Joel married his first wife Elizabeth Weber Small in 1973. They had been partners for years before they married. In 1982 they separated from each other and both moved on. He then went on to marry famous supermodel named Christie Brinkley. They then had a daughter named Alexa Ray on December 29, 1985. He then split from Christie Brinkley in 1993 and then met and married television star and journalist Katie Lee. The two divorced after being married for fives years. Billy Joel then went on to meet his current wife Alexis Roderick. They then married in 2015, and went on to have a baby named Della Rose. She was born on August 12, 2015. Billy Joel sold over 150 million successful albums and has won multiple awards. Throughout his career his singles hit the top charts almost every time. His singles hit the Top 40 thirty-three times through the 1970’s, 1980’s, and 1990’s. He received a Grammy Legend Award in 1990 and a Billboard Century Award in 1994 for his outstanding music. Later in Billy Joel’s career he suffered from an alcohol addiction and was continuously in rehab. He then recovered going on to make more music throughout the early 2000’s. Joel then released â€Å"All My Life† in 2007. The single was his first in thirteen years with original lyrics. Billy Joel performed multiple times at Madison Square Garden and broke records, selling out his concerts monthly. Billy Joel is one of successful artists of all time topping the charts numbers of time throughout the years. He has won several awards and sold out many shows at popular venues such as Madison Square Garden. Billy Joel has continued to perform and tour throughout the world and break records. How to cite Billy Joel, Papers

Hate Crime Laws Are They Constitutional Essay Example For Students

Hate Crime Laws: Are They Constitutional? Essay Are hate crime penalty enforcement laws constitutional? Thats Gay. If you are around teenagers today, that is a phrase you will most likely hear very often. It is not necessarily meant as a homophobic or hate-filled remark, and most of the time it is referring to an object, an idea, or a conversation; things that obviously have no sexual orientation. But now, according to a bill passed by the senate, it could almost be considered a hate crime. Many people support the widening of hate crime laws, assuming that with stricter penalties, the crimes will lessen. In June, 2004, Senate passed a bill that received a record number of votes, passing 65-33, including 18 Republicans voting yes. The measure will add sexual orientation, gender and disability to the list of motives that provide for enhanced federal prosecution of a violent crime against a person (Lochhead). The current hate crimes law, which originated during the civil rights movement of the 1960s when many Southern states failed to prosecute assaults on African Americans, includes crimes motivated by hatred based on race, color, religion, and national origin. Many see this as a step forward, but there are some who think it is unconstitutional. Religious groups argue that It advances the radical, well publicized agenda of homosexuals to gain acceptance for, and legal recognition of, homosexuality as a normal lifestyle (Toalston). So whos right? Should there be a separate category for crimes committed to minorities? Shouldnt all crimes be treated just as serious as another? I believe that the categorizing of crimes into Hate Crimes is just further segregating people because of their differences, and that paying more serious attention to crimes committed on minorities is sending a bad message to those who are in the majority. First off, many people perceive hate crime perpetrators as crazed neo-Nazis or skinheads. However, most hate crimes are carried out by otherwise law-abiding citizens who see little wrong with their actions. Alcohol and drugs sometimes help fuel these crimes, but the main determinant appears to be personal prejudice. New FBI data shows that the number of hate crimes reported in 2003 increased slightly, from 7,462 in 2002 to 7,489 in 2003. The 7,489 hate crime incidents reported to the FBI in 2003 involved 8,715 separate offenses affecting 9,100 victims (Kelotra). By far the largest determinant of hate crimes is racial bias, with 51. 3 percent of all hate crimes falling under this category, followed by Religion bias (17.9 percent), Sexual Orientation bias (16.5 percent), Ethnicity bias (13.7 percent) and Disability bias (0.4 percent) (Kelotra). According to FBI Uniform Crime reports, there were 30,606,332 crimes reported in 2003. So is it fair that 7,489 of them were treated with top-priority because of the persons race, religion, or sexual orientation? The Southern Baptist Conventions ethic agency doesnt think so, and theyre doing their best to try to reverse the bill that widens hate crime laws. Existing laws in every state cover real crimes of violence, vandalism and property destruction, which should be punished to the full extent of the law they argue (Toalston). Others argue that the bill is simply redundant. What is really being punished, as critics see it, is a criminals thoughts, however objectionable they may be. The actions incitement, vandalism, assault, murder are already against the law (Haberman). For every group against the defining of hate crimes, there are twice as many groups who feel it is more than necessary. Hate crimes are message crimes. They are different from other crimes in that the offender is sending a message to members of a certain group that they are unwelcome (McDevitt). While the constitution promises us free speech, it doesnt allow us to use that as a weapon to put certain groups in fear. As much as everybody has a right to voice their opinion, everyone also has a right to live their life in peace without discrimination. Another critical issue in hate crime is that studies indicate that hate crimes appear to have more serious psychological effects on the victims and the communities they represent than other crimes. Research shows that victims of hate crimes many times link their vulnerability to their personal, cultural, .